Alpha converts an existing SDK into other languages. Its console shows what was generated and how each piece was checked, then walks the maintainer through anything it couldn't convert, so they can decide what is safe to ship.
Every conversion leaves something Alpha can't translate on its own. Here it is compute_signature, a custom webhook signer. That is when a developer needs help most, and when a tool is most tempted to take over.
The first console said Succeeded, then pointed to a file stamped DO NOT EDIT that every regeneration overwrites.
Call a model, patch the stub, turn the badge green. Fast, and the developer ships code they never reviewed.
When Alpha can't finish the job, how does it guide the fix without making the call for the developer?
The Petstore sample SDK, Python to TypeScript: one run, one gap, one fix that survives regeneration.
The obvious version fixes the gap for you: call a model, patch the stub, show green. I designed the opposite defaults:





That adds steps to a tool whose promise is speed.
But a green check that isn't true costs more than a slower one that is.
The shortcut I rejected: let developers edit the generated stub. It is the fastest start, and the next regeneration silently deletes the fix.
A working prototype, tested with developers on my team. See Alpha at alphasdk.dev.
Tested with team developers · no baseline study yet
Task success, wrong-file edits, misread passes and time on task, against a baseline without the workspace. Then a keyboard-only pass and a contrast check before making any accessibility claim.
© 2026 · Cristal Jiang